By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Wisconsin DigestWisconsin Digest
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Health & Welfare
  • Justice & Safety
  • Opinion
  • Contact
  • Submit a News Release
  • About Us
Reading: Your Right to Know: When transparency is treated with contempt
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Boop! The Musical: Box Office Bomb Might be Closing Soon
2 days ago
The AI Revolution Rebuilding America’s Home Services
2 days ago
“Forex Trading: 10 Steps to Your First Million” — A Groundbreaking Book Redefining Success in the World of Trading
3 weeks ago
Lessons From The Trading Floor: Building Trust In The CFD Market
4 weeks ago
US Event: Pharma Partnering US Summit 2025
1 month ago
Aa
Wisconsin DigestWisconsin Digest
Aa
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Health & Welfare
  • Justice & Safety
  • Opinion
  • Contact
  • Submit a News Release
  • About Us
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Health & Welfare
  • Justice & Safety
  • Opinion
  • Contact
  • Submit a News Release
  • About Us
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Wisconsin Digest > Blog > Opinion > Your Right to Know: When transparency is treated with contempt
Opinion

Your Right to Know: When transparency is treated with contempt

Kary Stewart
Last updated: 2022/08/21 at 4:16 AM
Kary Stewart 3 years ago
Share
SHARE

Reading Time: 3 minutes Bill Lueders

Most of the time, public officials in Wisconsin obey the state’s openness laws. Sometimes, they need a little prodding from the courts. But the recent conduct of Robin Vos and Michael Gableman is something altogether new, and deeply disturbing.

Both Vos, the speaker of the state Assembly, and Gableman, whom Vos hired at taxpayer expense (more than $1 million and counting) to look for fraud in the 2020 election, have been cited for contempt of court regarding open records requests.

Vos, the architect of a failed 2015 attempt to gut the state’s open records law, was held in contempt by Dane County Circuit Judge Valerie Bailey-Rihn, for failing to produce records as ordered or explain why he couldn’t. He responded by lashing out at Bailey-Rihn, calling her “a liberal judge in Dane County trying to make us look bad.” Bailey-Rihn later opted not to impose penalties for contempt, but Vos (read: taxpayers) might yet have to pay associated legal costs.

Similarly, Dane County Circuit Judge Frank Remington found Gableman’s Office of Special Counsel in contempt over its handling of records requests and referred the former justice to the Office of Lawyer Regulation for possible disciplinary action for his disgraceful conduct during a court proceeding.

Gableman sneeringly refused to answer questions from Christa Westerberg, an attorney representing American Oversight, a group seeking records regarding Gableman’s probe, and vice president of the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council.

Gableman’s conduct was “misogynistic” and “an affront to the judicial process and an insult to Atty. Westerberg,” Remington wrote in his contempt order. “The circus Gableman created in the courtroom destroyed any sense of decorum and irreparably damaged the public’s perception of the judicial process.”

Gableman is appealing the $2,000-per-day penalty as “grossly disproportionate to the violation.”

At a subsequent hearing in which he managed to maintain his composure, Gableman admitted that he has routinely destroyed records he considers not relevant to his investigation.

“Did I delete documents? Yes, I did,” he told the court. These include his notes from trips he took on the taxpayer’s dime to Arizona to watch the widely ridiculed recount and to South Dakota to hear My Pillow founder Mike Lindell make baseless allegations of electoral fraud. (“I didn’t find anything that I could use during that seminar,” Gableman testified.)

Indiana attorney James Bopp Jr., representing Gableman’s Office of Special Counsel, argued in an April 8 letter that, absent a pending records request, there is no statutory requirement that records be preserved. But the Wisconsin Legislative Council, a nonpartisan service agency, had previously determined that this office was required to retain these records.

That’s right: Bopp declared from his perch in Indiana that he knew more about Wisconsin’s rules than the state itself. Gableman attained the same level of hubris in contending to reporters, “If I had to keep every scrap of paper I would do nothing else. I would need a warehouse.”

Really? A warehouse? How many taxpayer-funded records has Gableman destroyed?

In fact, released records reveal, among other things, that the work for which Gableman was pocketing $11,000 per month (it has since been cut in half) was, in the estimation of Judge Bailey-Rihn, “minimal.” Gableman is now being sued again by American Oversight, over his destruction of records.

Clearly, the state Legislature must do a better job of ensuring that those it hires are complying with their obligations under the state’s transparency laws. And Robin Vos and Michael Gableman should be held accountable for treating these laws with contempt.

Your Right to Know is a monthly column distributed by the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council (wisfoic.org), a group dedicated to open government. Bill Lueders, former editor and now editor-at-large of The Progressive, is the group’s president.

Your Right to Know: When transparency is treated with contempt is a post from WisconsinWatch.org, a non-profit investigative news site covering Wisconsin since 2009. Please consider making a contribution to support our journalism.

You Might Also Like

Navigating Success: Unveiling the Power of PR Agencies in Dallas

Spend with Ukraine: Supporting Ukrainian Companies in the Western Market

January 24 in Wisconsin’s history: What happened on the day

Exploring Wisconsin: The Top 10 Entertainment Websites

Unconventional Ways Big Data is Being Used in Public Relations

Kary Stewart August 21, 2022
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article Police in Wisconsin killed 149 people since 2013, lower than national rate 
Next Article Your Right to Know: Court ruling kneecaps records law

You Might Also Like

Navigating Success: Unveiling the Power of PR Agencies in Dallas

2 years ago

Spend with Ukraine: Supporting Ukrainian Companies in the Western Market

2 years ago

January 24 in Wisconsin’s history: What happened on the day

2 years ago

Exploring Wisconsin: The Top 10 Entertainment Websites

2 years ago

Latest news about Wisconsin life.

Find Us on Socials

© wisconsindigest.com. All Rights Reserved.

Join Us!

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..

[mc4wp_form]
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?